You don't have to be in a formal debate to get asked hard questions about Christianity and when they do come up, we feel the same way. A flash of anxiety, followed by the desperate search for the right words, maybe silence or a feeling of worry because we don’t know the answer.
The good news is that these questions aren't new.
Scholars, philosophers, and ordinary believers have been wrestling with them for centuries. What follows are five of the most common objections and some honest, accessible ways to engage them.
1. "God's not real, look at all the evil in the world!"
This can be a hard one. It cuts close because it isn't abstract. It's personal. Someone lost a child, watched a parent suffer, or survived something they can't explain. Or just taking a look at the daily news can cause one to say, there is no god.
The first thing to recognize is that this question, as powerful as it feels, doesn't actually disprove God. It raises the question of why God would permit suffering, which is a different conversation than whether God exists at all.
Philosophers call the two versions the "logical" and "evidential" problem of evil. The logical version says since there is so much bad in the world, there cannot be a good god. Most philosophers, including atheist ones, have abandoned that version, because it's extraordinarily difficult to prove that no possible reason could justify God allowing evil. The evidential version is more modest. It says the amount of suffering in the world makes God unlikely.
The Christian response leans on a few things. First, as C.S Lewis puts it..."You cannot know a crooked line without first knowing what a straight line is". Or in other words, there is no such thing as "evil" or "wrong" if there is no objective (outside of ourselves) standard of "good". Everything would just be an opinion. Example...The standards (or rules) must be set before one plays a game like baseball, you can't start making up rules mid-game. Granted, life is more complex than a game of baseball but the same logic applies. Suffering isn't random in a theistic universe. It can produce things like courage, compassion, depth of character, and dependence on God that wouldn't exist without it. Most importanly, humans were given free will, to make choices. We only see a very tiny part of the universe's timeline. There are things happening or being set in place now, which will cause a ripple effect into the future (butterfly effect).
Second, the Christian God is not distant from suffering. He entered it. The cross is not God watching from afar. It's God participating.
That doesn't resolve every tearful question. But it does change the frame.
2. "Isn't Faith Just Wishful Thinking?"
This one assumes that believing in God is a matter of emotional preference rather than reason. And for some people, it is, which is exactly the problem apologetics is designed to fix.
The response is simple. Christianity makes specific, falsifiable historical claims. The tomb was empty. The disciples saw the risen Jesus. These aren't feelings, they're events that can be examined and tested. If Jesus didn't rise from the dead, Paul himself says Christianity is false.
Faith, in the biblical sense, is not complete belief without evidence. It's trust based on evidence. The same way you trust a chair to hold you because of what you know about chairs, not because you've performed a structural analysis every time you sit down.
3. "What About All the Contradictions in the Bible?"
Most people who raise this objection have heard that contradictions exist. They haven't necessarily found them themselves. When you press for specifics, the conversation gets much more productive.
The vast majority of alleged contradictions fall into a few categories. Differences in perspective among eyewitnesses (which actually supports authenticity, not the opposite), cultural idioms misread literally, or translation issues. J. Warner Wallace brings a forensic approach that's useful here. Eyewitness testimony that perfectly agrees on every detail is actually more suspicious than accounts that differ in minor peripheral ways.
The deeper question is whether the Bible is historically reliable. The manuscript evidence for the New Testament is staggering. Over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, 10s of thousands of Latin, Syriac (Aramaic), Coptic, and Hebrew as well. Compared to just a handful for most ancient texts like Homer's Iliad or biographies of Alexander the Great. The core of the text has been stable for centuries, and the longer time goes on we actually get closer to the original! Wesley Huff gives a great presentation on this topic.
4. "Hasn't Science Disproved God?"
No serious scientist or philosopher claims this. What some claim is that God is an unnecessary hypothesis, but that's a philosophical claim, not a scientific one.
In fact, several findings of modern science point in the other direction. The Big Bang established that the universe had a beginning, which aligns precisely with the theological claim that something caused it to exist. The fine-tuning of physical constants (gravity, the cosmological constant, the ratio of electrons to protons) is so precise that physicists themselves describe it as extraordinary. The discovery of DNA revealed that life is fundamentally information, and information, in our experience, always comes from a mind.
Science describes how the universe works. It doesn't tell you why there's something rather than nothing.
5. "How Do You Know Christianity Is the Right Religion?"
This is actually a fair question, and it deserves a fair answer. The response is to take a step back and ask, what kind of evidence would settle it?
Christianity stands or falls on the resurrection. If Jesus rose from the dead, the faith is true. If he didn't, it isn't. That makes it uniquely testable among world religions, because it's staked on a specific historical event, not just a collection of moral teachings or spiritual experiences.
The historical case for the resurrection (the empty tomb, the post-resurrection appearances, the transformation of the disciples, the conversion of Paul and James) is stronger than most people realize. Start there.
If you want to go deeper, Frank Turek and William Lane Craig are two of the clearest voices on these questions, and both have spent careers helping ordinary people think through them with honesty and care.
